Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Original file (NR9393 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

SIN
Docket No: 9393-14
10 February 2015

 

 

4

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 January 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

6 February 2002. On 24 July 2009, a medical board diagnosed you
with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol abuse, anda
major depressive disorder. After being afforded all of your
procedural rights, you were place on the temporary disability
retirement list (TDRL). You remained on the TDRL until 17 July
2012, when the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found you fit to
return to full duty. Notification of the findings by the PEB was
forwarded to the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) on 26 July 2012.

On 22 August 2012, you were notified that you were being
discharged from the Navy, and your status on the TDRL would be
terminated. At that time, you had approximately 45 days to elect
the option of reenlisting in the Navy or Navy Reserve. You did
not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from
the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability)
reentry code. In this regard, you were assigned the most
favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3P
reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires that a
waiver be obtained from recruiting personnel who are responsible
for reviewing the feasibility of satisfying the Navy personnel
manning goals by determining whether or not an individual meets
the standards for reenlistment. If you wish to reenlist, re-
affiliate, or be reinstated in the Navy, you should contact the
Navy Corps Recruiting Command via your nearest recruiting
facility. ,

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service, and your desire to change your RE-3P
reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors
were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code
given the fact you were offered and opportunity to reenlist in
the Navy or Navy Reserve after being found fit for full duty. In
this regard, an RE-3P reentry code is authorized when a Sailor is
discharged due to a physical disability and is not recommended
For retention. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerel

 

ROBERT J.
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9579 14

    Original file (NR9579 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you were assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1668 14

    Original file (NR1668 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. A review of your medical prescreening documents revealed no record of you reporting the ankle injury or the history of suicidal thoughts...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2112 14

    Original file (NR2112 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. At that time, you were assigned an RE-3P (failure to meet physical/medical standards) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04422-10

    Original file (04422-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2011. You were discharged in accordance with the approved findings of the PEB on 31 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05799-05

    Original file (05799-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    05799-05 21 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11272 12

    Original file (11272 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5369 14

    Original file (NR5369 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Further, an RE-3P reentry code is authorized when a Marine is discharged due to a condition, not a disability, and recommended for reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01948-01

    Original file (01948-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR786 14

    Original file (NR786 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR866 14

    Original file (NR866 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, © carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to change your reenlistment code for possible reentry into military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...